|
In informal logic and philosophy, an argument map is a visual representation of the structure of an argument. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals, and lemmas. Typically an argument map is a "box and arrow" diagram with boxes corresponding to propositions and arrows corresponding to relationships such as evidential support. Argument maps are commonly used in the context of teaching and applying critical thinking.〔For example: ; ; ; 〕 The purpose of mapping is to uncover the logical structure of arguments, identify unstated assumptions, evaluate the support an argument offers for a conclusion, and aid understanding of debates. Argument maps are often designed to support deliberation of issues, ideas and arguments in wicked problems. An argument map is not to be confused with a concept map or a mind map, which are less strict in relating claims. ==Introduction== This is a simple argument map. The ''conclusion'' is shown at the top, and the boxes linked to it represent supporting ''reasons'', which comprise one or more ''premises''. The ''reason'', 1A, comprising two ''premises ''1A-a and 1A-b, support the ''conclusion'': Here is a more complex map. The objection 1A weakens the conclusion, while the reason 2A supports premise 1A-b of the objection: 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「argument map」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|